$2 Challenger Pool - 5 Gallon Bay

OneCycle · **Posted:** February 10th, 2013, 6:20 pm

DoktorC wrote:

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Rob's did 90 with less power...so...with hull mods it may just be. That is NOT an official statement so don't let it go to your head...

dont worry it wont... i have already set in my mind that anything over 86 is acceptable.... anything under i'm taking up sailing.

DoktorC · **Posted:** February 10th, 2013, 6:25 pm

OneCycle wrote:

DoktorC wrote:

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Rob's did 90 with less power...so...with hull mods it may just be. That is NOT an official statement so don't let it go to your head...

dont worry it wont... i have already set in my mind that anything over 86 is acceptable.... anything under i'm taking up sailing.

I see this in your future....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMkIuKXwmlU

I would swear that is Graham Baird...lol

Berzerko · **Joined:** April 16th, 2012, 8:41 am **Posts:** 12

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Your fellow Canadian rbt claimed 90 plus why's it unattainable, airated hull ?
James I put you at 90.1 how's that

OneCycle · **Posted:** February 10th, 2013, 7:12 pm

Berzerko wrote:

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Your fellow Canadian rbt claimed 90 plus why's it unattainable, airated hull ?
James I put you at 90.1 how's that

But is that actually true ... who knows.. We know it didn't go faster than 91... Because nobody lies backwards...
It ran 87 every day... But a best of 91.. Seems weird that there would be 4mph difference in everyday and top speed.

But who am I to say RBT wasn't going that fast after all he does know a thing or two.

3bilgepumps · **Joined:** April 3rd, 2012, 1:27 pm **Posts:** 122

OneCycle wrote:

Berzerko wrote:

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Your fellow Canadian rbt claimed 90 plus why's it unattainable, airated hull ?
James I put you at 90.1 how's that

But is that actually true ... who knows.. We know it didn't go faster than 91... Because nobody lies backwards...
It ran 87 every day... But a best of 91.. Seems weird that there would be 4mph difference in everyday and top speed.

But who am I to say RBT wasn't going that fast after all he does know a thing or two.

Here we go again...

DoktorC · **Posted:** February 10th, 2013, 7:39 pm

3bilgepumps wrote:

Here we go again...

Exactly...don't believe the guys that you actually know but the random internet dude is legit lol...

My SRV ran 90 everyday with a best of 93...that's 3mph. Dave's Soup Bowl had an even bigger spread....4mph is no big deal from your everyday setup to your balls to wall, no gas, cold air setup.

Isn't that part of the reason for our run being in late September??? :mrgreen:

OneCycle · **Posted:** February 10th, 2013, 7:43 pm

DoktorC wrote:

3bilgepumps wrote:

Here we go again...

Exactly...don't believe the guys that you actually know but the random internet dude is legit lol...

My SRV ran 90 everyday with a best of 93...that's 3mph. Dave's Soup Bowl had an even bigger spread....4mph is no big deal from your everyday setup to your balls to wall, no gas, cold air setup.

Isn't that part of the reason for our run being in late September??? :mrgreen:

But.... did your SRV Actually go 93....?

DoktorC · **Posted:** February 10th, 2013, 7:48 pm

OneCycle wrote:

But.... did your SRV Actually go 93....?

Yes...according to facebook...

Did Rob tell you otherwise (about his challenger speed)?

I think it was RBT...but it might have been Phil....that actually cleared my original 93mph run off my GPS in the boat lol.

Berzerko · **Joined:** April 16th, 2012, 8:41 am **Posts:** 12

OneCycle wrote:

Berzerko wrote:

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Your fellow Canadian rbt claimed 90 plus why's it unattainable, airated hull ?
James I put you at 90.1 how's that

But is that actually true ... who knows.. We know it didn't go faster than 91... Because nobody lies backwards...
It ran 87 every day... But a best of 91.. Seems weird that there would be 4mph difference in everyday and top speed.

But who am I to say RBT wasn't going that fast after all he does know a thing or two.

Chris (goneby) claimed 85 when he owned my challenger with 300xs power with minimal set up or props, and my challenger is a Tank that's not nearly as detailed or refined as yours

SHIVERS · **Joined:** April 21st, 2012, 1:57 am **Posts:** 411

Berzerko wrote:

OneCycle wrote:

And just for the Record i think 90 is unachievable...... but i do think high 80 hopefully ..

Your fellow Canadian rbt claimed 90 plus why's it unattainable, airated hull ?
James I put you at 90.1 how's that

I spoke to the owner after rbt and he claimed about the same speed! I based my guestimate on this info. and the claimed motor mods being 337hp, 90+ should be no problem! The RBT challenger had the notched aerated hull, but James has the same setback and the wider pad should carry the motor weight setback nicely!

HPBCANADA.COM

$2 Challenger Pool - 5 Gallon Bay

Who is online