It is currently October 5th, 2024, 10:29 pm

Ox66 case vs HPDI

View active topics

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 PostPosted: August 1st, 2013, 12:16 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: August 30th, 2012, 11:21 am
Posts: 325
Further to my wanted add for a new lower, I thought I'd post up the differences on my boat between a coned OX66 lower against an HPDI unit. First difference I noticed is the HPDI unit is lighter, by 8lbs to be precise. I know the gear ratio difference will be there, (1:81 vs 1:75), we'll see if the motor notices. The skeg is substantially larger on the Hpdi and has a built-in torque tab that looks to be larger and likely more effective than the riveted-on Bob's unit I have. Overall length (tip of bullet to rear of casing) is 20" on OX66 and 17 1/8" on HPDI, a difference of 2 7/8". Propshaft is 1" higher on HPDI relative to mounting surface. Lighter and a lower overall centre of gravity, albeit small, is at least a step in the right direction. I'll add as I find out. Hopefully will have the HPDI unit on for next weekend.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 1st, 2013, 4:59 pm   
HPBC PRESIDENT
User avatar

Joined: March 30th, 2012, 2:25 pm
Posts: 2392
Location: Barrie, On
interesting that the HPDI is "shorter".. you get to lower your motor a little bit.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 1st, 2013, 5:07 pm   
Team Member
User avatar

Joined: April 1st, 2012, 4:55 pm
Posts: 1423
Location: Owen Sound
The big thing is... How good was the cone/tamer job on the OX case? I think that the biiig skeg(which I like btw) might slow things down a bit. Regardless... After this case.. I'm done with OX cases.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 1st, 2013, 8:23 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: August 30th, 2012, 11:21 am
Posts: 325
mitchie wrote:
The big thing is... How good was the cone/tamer job on the OX case? I think that the biiig skeg(which I like btw) might slow things down a bit. Regardless... After this case.. I'm done with OX cases.

The job was pretty decent, I'd say an 8.5 outta 10. I'll take some sq. inch measurements of the skeg and find the difference in surface area, and do the same with the difference in length of the case, I bet it's close.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 2nd, 2013, 8:18 am   
Team Member
User avatar

Joined: April 1st, 2012, 4:55 pm
Posts: 1423
Location: Owen Sound
I'm thinking the thickness.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 2nd, 2013, 2:21 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: August 30th, 2012, 11:21 am
Posts: 325
mitchie wrote:
I'm thinking the thickness.

Ahh yes, the thickness... I'll measure it and see, front,middle, and the tab and see what's up.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 2nd, 2013, 2:26 pm   
HPBC PRESIDENT
User avatar

Joined: March 31st, 2012, 5:53 pm
Posts: 3548
Location: Lapping lil charger
Mitchie is all about girth...

_________________
08 SRV w/3.1 Hydro-tec Phase lll

I've got enough torque to tear a hole....in time...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 2nd, 2013, 2:28 pm   
HPBC PRESIDENT
User avatar

Joined: March 30th, 2012, 2:25 pm
Posts: 2392
Location: Barrie, On
Mitchies a yard sale. Poeple don't need skegs


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 18th, 2013, 7:50 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: August 30th, 2012, 11:21 am
Posts: 325
Did some preliminary testing today with an HPDI lower. It had five exhaust relief holes in each side, and slightly modified water intakes. I found the results interesting.
Pros of HPDI unit...
1) Higher top speed, 81.7 vs a previous best of 80.5.
2) Handling improved, turning at any speed was far more positive, also tended to chinewalk less.
3) A factory finish on case is WAY better than painted and epoxied. (and paint again, and again...)
4) Overall seems to be a tougher unit, the bearing carrier is retained better IMO.
Cons of HPDI unit...
1) Killed holeshot, I think because of many factors, higher gear ratio (1:75 vs 1:81, 3.5%), exhaust relief may have taken away some low end punch, and caused less exhaust gasses around prop at below planing speeds. This could likely be mitigated with larger relief holes in prop, an over-hub may not have noticed at all.
2) Considerably less bow lift. It would still carry the bow fine, but required quite a bit more positive trim to do it.
3) Less water psi at same transom height as my Bob's coned OX66 lower, there is a mod for the HPDI unit that would likely fix that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: August 18th, 2013, 8:00 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: August 12th, 2012, 8:37 pm
Posts: 2699
Location: lake Muskoka
how much did your rpm change with the new ratio ?

_________________
Image
89 excel 91 valero,81mph sold
1988 baja x 15, chopped to 13'11" modvp Bridgeport 91mph
19' tempest picklefork 84 mod vpcarb 102mph


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style originally created by Volize © 2003 • Redesigned SkyLine by MartectX © 2008 - 2010